Philosophy, theory and program
Philosophy, theory, and program are three different subjects but they are interrelated to each other. These three subjects have not been studied as separately as required. Philosophy somewhere is mixed up with the programs and somewhere with theories. In many logical studies, we still find no clear indication to differentiate between theories and philosophy. Likewise, since Karl Marx said that the purpose of philosophy is not about explaining but changing the world, Marxists are always mixing up philosophy and programs.
Philosophy explains all
the aspects of the world on the basis of a common rule. Philosophy is not
relative but the absolute truth. So the philosophy cannot be different for the
people of different race, class, religion, language, culture, gender etc. In a
whole life, one can't understand all the truth of the world but the conclusion
of everything with the help of philosophy. If someone wants to know every
detail of a subject then philosophy can't help but he needs theory on that
subject. Theory can be written on every subject when facts are known. Until
today, theses theories have been called to be the philosophy but they are not
the philosophy instead they are theories on certain subjects. The special rule
that applies to certain subjects is called the theory of the subject.
Philosophy is a common rule that applies to everything. Philosophy and theory
are neutral. They are neither progressive nor regressive. People who write
philosophy or theory have the purpose of writing e.g. revealing the truth of
the world but philosophy and theory themselves are purposeless facts.
Programs have purposes. They are not neutral. There might be
different programs for the people of different race, religion, language,
culture, gender etc. Programs are made to meet the certain purpose. But
different people might have different purposes. So programs of different people
may conflict with each other.
People with the help of their philosophy and theories; make plans
to meet their purposes. These plans are programs.
'Law of Action and Reaction' is a common rule that applies to
philosophy, theory and program.
1 Philosophy
Philosophy
is the rule that applies to everything that exists. There is nothing that is
beyond the rule of philosophy. In other words, philosophy is the rule that has
no any exception. Philosophy is an absolute truth. Philosophy is required to
understand nature, society, events and even the changes on these. The duty of
Philosophy is to make everything understandable with a common rule. Everything
that exists in this universe can be explained by the common rule of philosophy.
With the help of philosophy, one can analyze the state and changes in life and
surroundings without any surprise. Hence it is a duty of philosophy to
explain everything not through the technical level but on the basis of a common
rule. In other words, philosophy can't answer the question 'why magnet attracts
iron?' but it can answer the question 'why people die?'
1.1 Law of Action and
Reaction
Everything in the world
changes as time passes by. So nothing can last permanently forever. Everything
changes through the process of action and reaction. The reaction is inevitable
for every action and action is mandatory for every reaction. If creation is
supposed to be an action then destruction is the reaction. If destruction is an
action then what forms after destruction is the reaction. In an 'event series,'
the first event is action and the second event is the reaction. The action is
the reason and reaction is the result. Pressure, heat on a rock is action; soil
made after the destruction of rock is the reaction. Chemical process inside an
egg is action, chicken coming out is a reaction. The reason that excites
someone emotionally is action, work done afterward is the reaction.
In the 'Law of Action and Reaction', everything and every aspect
of existence can be divided into two categories; 'Consciousness Free Field' and
'Consciousness Controlled Field'. 'Law of Action and Reaction' equally applies
to both of these fields. Moreover, both of the fields have their own
representative sub-rule. 'Spiral Rule' represents the 'Consciousness Free
Field' and 'Situation + Consciousness = Changed Situation' represents the
'Consciousness Controlled Field'.
A) Consciousness Free Field
People, flora and
fauna, air, water, temperature, rock, soil, heavenly
bodies, electro-magnetic waves, proton, electron etc. are studied
isolating from the consciousness of people in this field.
Every change on 'Consciousness Free Field' rolls on a cycle. After
completion of certain phases, everything must repeat the previous stage again.
The never ending process of creation and destruction runs in a cycle. The
life-cycle of living things (butterfly-egg-larva-pupa) and existence-cycle of
nonliving things must follow this rule. Even our earth will be destroyed some
day in future. Many earth-like planets are always in their process of creation,
development or destruction. This is the rule.
Plants make food by the process of photosynthesis. Animal and
human live eating plants and plant made food. When animal and human die they
form the organic substance from where new plants grow again.
These rules are out of control of human consciousness. That's why
they are on 'Consciousness Free Field'. The rule on this field is named as
'Spiral Rule'. But the full form of the rule is 'Irregular Spiral Cycle Rule'.
This rule can be illustrated in a diagram as follows.
Events
in nature occur almost in a cycle. But events don't repeat just like a rolling
wheel repeats. The cycle of creation and destruction always runs but the newly
formed creations need not be the 'same-on-every-aspect' as the destroyed one.
That's why this cycle is 'Spiral' and 'Irregular'. In other words ancient human
with monkey-like face have developed themselves to today's human after a
certain period of time in the process of development or evolution. It need not
change today's human face in the same ratio after the same period of time. The
changes are the influence of environment and development or evolution. The
speed of changes need not be the same as past. The whole thing as it is in
present will never repeat in the future. That's why the process must be
understood as the words mean by 'Irregular Spiral Cycle Rule'. But only 'Spiral
Rule' is used as an abbreviation. The major rule 'Law of Action and Reaction'
also applies to 'Spiral Rule'. For example; if a butterfly is an action then
the egg is the reaction, if the egg is action then larva is the reaction and so
on.
B) Consciousness controlled field
The
subjects controlled by knowledge, concept, consciousness such as social
behaviors, norms, culture, events or thoughts of people, the contradiction
between thoughts etc. are studied in this field. The representative rule of
this field says that environment/situation affects the consciousness and
consciousness changes the environment/situation. The rule can be written as
'Situation (First) + Consciousness (Second) = Changed Situation (Third)'.
The changes that come to the field of 'Consciousness Controlled
Field' is explained by the rule 'Situation + Consciousness = Changed
Situation'. Moreover, the major rule 'Law of Action and Reaction' also applies
on this sub-rule. When 'Situation' is supposed to be action then
'Consciousness' is the reaction and when 'Consciousness' is action then
'Changed Situation' is the reaction.
1.2 Examples of events
Every incident can be explained on the basis of philosophy.
In the philosophy chart, the law of action and reaction is
categorized into 'spiral rule' and 'situation + consciousness = changed
situation'. Some examples are presented below to make the rule understand
clearly.
b) Dropping down an apple from a
tree is 'Situation'. Finding the law of gravity by Sir Isaac Newton is
'Consciousness'. Invention of machines using gravity is 'Changed Situation'
Now let's explain some events with the help of philosophical
references.
1) Wildfire
If someone sets fire on the forest, it’s the
implementation of his plan, the successful 'Changed Situation'. If the fire was
set by an accident, it's still a 'Changed Situation' but the failed one. It is
failure or loss when fire, explosives managed for some other purpose results in
wildfire.
If wildfire was the result of lighting or some
other natural reason then the process falls into the field of 'Consciousness
Free Field'. On the process of creation and destruction, the materials of the
forest are destroyed and new things are created at the same tim
2) Talking to each other
This is the
'Consciousness' phase in the rule 'Situation + Consciousness = Changed
Situation'. Talking, knowing, communicating and learning are related to
consciousness.
3) Flood
The weakness of land,
heavy rain, flood, soil erosion, loss of lives and properties etc. complete the
long cycle and every second event can be considered as the reaction of the
first event. We are talking about 'Spiral Rule' on 'Consciousness Free Field'. Some
parts of the event can be analyzed with 'Consciousness Controlled Field' rule
too. Flood, People in trap and relief work can be considered as 'Situation +
Consciousness = Changed Situation'. Here too, every second event is the
reaction of the first event.
4) Reading
-knowing the
importance of reading is action, reading is a reaction.
-curiosity to know the
news is action, reading newspapers is a reaction.
-reading is action,
knowing something by reading is a reaction.
-reading is action;
not agreeing with the matter is a reaction.
-reading is action,
taking time is a reaction.
-reading many
times (using book) is action, wearing out of the book is a
reaction.
Reading action is
inside the field that is controlled by consciousness. So the sub-rule
'Situation + Consciousness = Changed Situation' apply on this action. Hence
explanation can be done as 'knowing the importance of reading' is Situation,
'act of reading' is Consciousness and 'work performed as a result of the
reading' is Changed Situation.
5) American war of anti-terrorism
Event series 1
Situation: - Terrorist attack
of 9/11.
Consciousness: - America seeks
for solidarity to go on war against world terrorism.
Changed Situation: - NATO-led army attacks
on possible places of Iraq and Afghanistan.
Event series 2
Situation: - Al-Qaeda organization
was ruined by the war.
Consciousness: - IS organization
replaced the al Al-Qaeda and became powerful.
Changed Situation: - IS attached the
supports of NATO including France.
Complexity of events
It will be easier to understand if a group of certain events is
defined by some words.
Event Order
Group of events that occur one by one in an order can be called
event order. An example of event order is group of events occurred in the year
2015.
Event series
Group of events that follow a certain rule can be defined as
event series. Group of two events which follow the rule 'Action
and Reaction', a group of three events which follow the rule
'Situation + Consciousness = Changed Situation' and a group of numerous events
following the 'Spiral Rule' are event series.
Event network
Many events can occur
by a single reason and a single event can occur by many reasons. French
Revolution is a single event caused by many reasons. Likewise, First World War
is a single reason that created many events like loss of lives and
property, the rise of Hitler in Germany, an organization of neutral countries
etc. Numerous actions (reasons) and its single reaction (result) or a single
action and their numerous actions form an event network.
2 Theory
The curiosity of people on gaining knowledge is not satisfied by
the explanation made on the basis of a common rule of philosophy. People tend
to gain every detail of knowledge in the field of their interest. To gain deep
knowledge in a certain subject one need to know the theory of the subject. As
mentioned in philosophy, sources of knowledge are divided into two fields 1)
Consciousness Free Field and 2) Consciousness Controlled Field. On each field,
there are numerous subjects and their theories. Law of conservation of energy,
the theory of evolution, theory of relativity, Archimedes's principle of
upthrust, Newton's laws of motion, electromagnetic theory, motor effect etc.
are theories inside 'Consciousness Free Field'. These theories are applicable
only in 'Consciousness Free Field'. People who deal only with this field and
find out new theories are called scientists.
On the
other hand, law of contradiction, causes of social change, philosophy
of fearism, psychology, skepticism, idealism, philosophy of mind, analytic
philosophy, humanism, existentialism, structuralism etc. are some of the
theories inside 'Consciousness Controlled Field'. Some of these theories can
apply to both 'Consciousness Free and Consciousness Controlled Field'. The
people who study or deal with and find out new theories in this field are
called philosophers. Buddha, Confucius, Lao-tzu/Laozi, Socrates, Plato,
Aristotle, Hegel, Marx, Frayed, Osho etc. are such people.
In 'Consciousness Free Field' laboratories and even
mathematical formulas are used for verification of the theories. So there are
fewer disputes on theories in this field.
The truth of theories on 'Consciousness Controlled Field' is
verified with the help of history, true stories, social events, true logics and
personal experiences. One's brain analyzes things to develop the theories.
One's thinking power plays the most vital role on finalizing the theories. But
different people think in a different way. So there are more disputes on the
theories in this field. On consciousness controlled and consciousness free both
field there is the continuation of finding out and writing new theories
2.1 Self conscience and
creativity on consciousness
Character
and thoughts of every person must differ to each other. Let's define such
characteristics as 'self-conscience' and 'creativity'. It's mandatory to have
self-conscience and creativity on the consciousness of living beings.
Why must consciousness
have self-conscience and creativity? Let's talk about it. Let's suppose that
there are two similar pens produced by the same factory. Both of them have the
same color and same looks. They give the same reactions when they are touched,
burn or broken. Now let's try to find out differences between them. One pen
might have been produced a bit earlier and the other one later. One might have
been touched by human hands many times and the other is less. At the time of
packing or transportation one pen might have dropped down and other did not.
These are some possibilities. If we go further back to the raw materials of the
pens, they must have compulsory gone through different stages and phases. So
there are no any two things in the world that can go through the completely
identical historical backgrounds.
How consciousness is
created in living things is crucial at this point. After a special Intercourse
between selected material substance and environmental elements (air, light,
temperature, humidity etc.) consciousness is developed in living beings. As
mentioned above, there are significant differences between such material
substances and environmental elements from their historical backgrounds. So it
is a must that the consciousness developed by such different substances and
element must differ to each other. In another word, there must be
'self-conscience' and 'creativity' in consciousness.
The process of
creating consciousness is too critical. A small difference in a mother cell can
result in a big difference in its child character.
Either first born
consciousness in nature or the consciousness born by reproduction, both of them
acquire the unique characteristic (self-conscience and creativity) by
historically not identical raw materials and environmental effects of that
time.
At the time of raising
the newly born babies, the education provided to them and influences of
surroundings also play a great role in characters building. However, twins
raised in almost in the same situation also have great character differences.
Few similarities on them are the result of few similar material substance and
environmental elements on their birth.
As a result of
self-conscience and creativity, everyone thinks in a different way. Lack of
knowledge, biases, prejudice, selfishness, endorsement etc. are also
responsible for developing different concepts on the same topic. Different
thoughts contradict to each other.
'Self-conscience' and
'creativity' don't mean that every person must have different thoughts on every
topic. They mean there are no two people in the world who have the common
opinion on everything.
2.2 Fundamental
classification of logic
The great poet of Nepal
has written an essay, explaining how Nepal is beautiful, peaceful
and large. The essay goes 'Abroad is merely a dream, it's a story of
nowhere, it's an unseen light, it an unclear and un-preferred talk. My eyesight
has nothing to do with something that's beyond my horizon.'
The essay is full of
such logics. Most of the readers when reading the essay simply say 'wow!
how beautiful logics'. But these logics are not the real one, these are
artistic logics. Logic can be classified into true logic and artistic logic.
Different between them are written in the table below.
|
True Logic |
Artistic Logic |
|
|
1 |
True logics are used more on court |
Artistic logics are more used on
literature |
|
2 |
Purpose of true logic is to find
out the truth |
Purpose of logics is to attract
and influence |
|
3 |
True logics don't preferably use
proverbs and saying |
Artistic logics use proverbs and
saying |
|
4 |
Examples are given from true story
and related subjects |
Example can be given from
anything, relevant or irrelevant |
|
5 |
Related with facts |
Related with feelings |
|
6 |
Example: - Answer to what is life?
Is 'Life is the time period between birth and death' |
Example: - Answer to What is life?
is 'Life is a struggle', 'Life is a drama', 'Life is a dewdrop' etc. |
Artistic logic does not
necessarily require truth or facts but it must be artistic enough to attract
and pinch the heart of people. So it can't explain causes and effects of
anything properly instead, it can just amuse the people with irrelevant but
attractive pieces of expression. Someone unaware of the existence of two type
of logic can easily be puzzled by the artistic logic.
Artistic logic can't
defeat the true logic on a long run of discussion but it can confuse the people
easily.
A great characteristic
of artistic logic is that it never changes its mind from the preconceived
opinion. It backs the prejudiced concept and biased thinking. But the true
logic is dynamic. It's always on the way to find the truth of everything so it
does not back the preconceived opinion but it changes its way of thinking if
something wrong is detected on its preconception.
In fact, true and
artistic logic have the different field of implementation. One does not work on
other's field. There is no any role of artistic logic on the study of
philosophy, theory, and program where only real facts are supposed to be used.
The only use of true logic leads to the right destination here.
Artistic logic is
touchy, it sounds sweet but it can mislead. However artistic logic is used to
create interest on something. Conversations sound boring without artistic
logic. No literature can be written without artistic logic. The beauty of lives
withers if there is no artistic logic. Artistic logic creates feelings and
emotions.
True logic is not the
subjects of cry and laughter. It only shows what the truth is. It possesses no
kidding and no sentiments. It only deals with reality and fact.
2.2 Why something happens ?
Question: 'Why body
shivers in cold?'
Answer: 'Body shivers
to create warmth.'
The answer is not
answering 'why the incident takes place' but it's showing what happens after
the incident. Incidents take place one by one in an order. 'Law of Action and
Reaction' says first incident (action) becomes reason to the second one
(reaction) and second is the result of first incident. That's why the above
answer does not match the question. Question is asking the reason of act where
as answer is indicating the purpose of act. If something gets worse on the
body, the related field of immunity system is stimulated and it starts
reacting. This concept can be used to find out the best answer to the question,
'Why body shivers in cold?'
The traditional answer
may mean that someone becomes conscious about the poor condition of body and it
orders cells to vibrate so that it can produce heat to save the body. This kind
of answer accepts the existence of consciousness on 'Consciousness Free Field',
which is never possible.
Human nose was not
created by someone to mean to breathe and live a life. The technical answer of
the question is to be dealt in the related field of study. But on the basis of
philosophy we can say that nose was not created by someone thinking that 'it is
necessary to breathe'. But after the development of nose at the process of
evolution, the nose-holding living being had been able to live on that body
structure. The part of the body in living things is the result of surroundings
or environment itself.
Few trees can be found
on Savanna grassland. Now the question is why the trees on Savanna grassland
have swollen trunk? The right answer is not because to save the trees from
dryness. The swollen trunk has no any 'Purpose' to save the tree; there is only
'Reason and Result'. Grass and tree both have long roots on Savanna grassland.
Less water or dryness of land stimulates root to grow longer. Longer the root,
more the water they collect on the trunk and the trunk swells. The water on
swollen trunk saves the tree from dryness. This is the best way to understand why
something happens.
Now let's see why
something happens in 'Consciousness Controlled Field'. In this field it's
possible to make incident to take place according to future expectations.
It seems result causes
the reason. But it's not like that. Every future expectation is a result of
present situation. There must be a clear 'reason' in the present for any future
expectation. The reason (Situation) creates the plan (Consciousness) and the
plan creates success or failure (Changed Situation).
3 Program
Programs are fixed by desires and
necessities of people. People take help of philosophy and theories for right
implementation of plans to get a successful program. People can cancel the
program if they see no theoretical and philosophical base for a program to meet
the success. Programs can be personal, communal, national or international.
Programs can either meet success or
end on failure. The success of a program depends on how the programmer manages
and conducts his capability, skill, wisdom, cleverness, character, patience
etc. Different programs of different people can contradict each other. On such
condition, only one program succeeds and other fails. In a competition or a
tournament, the winner is the one who uses his skill, ability, cleverness etc.
better than the opponent. Right analysis of the situation while making a plan
is much more important for better plans. Spying agencies of nations are for
such purposes.
To get success on any target, first
of all, the target is analyzed on every aspect. Then one's ability over the
target is identified before making plans.
What happens if two different programs are made by different
people to win the same target? If both programs are right and based on the
rule, both of them can succeed. There is not only one way to solve any
problems. Different programs are made by different people because different
people have different ability and different way of thinking because of
'self-conscience' and 'creativity'. However, it's not true that every problem
must have more ways of solution. Some problems never have any solution.
let's see of some political
programs.
A) Program of Democrats
Their
program is to end autocracy. Country is governed by elected representatives.
Power is separated between legislative, executive and judiciary. People
have freedom to use their democratic right.
B) Program of socialist
This
program was developed to minimize the shortcomings of total freedom such as
labor exploitation, inequality etc. Under this program, some means of
productions are brought under government control.
C) Program
of communist
After
successful implementation of socialism gradually all the private things are
made public. Then personal needs are provided by society and social needs are
fulfilled by person.
3.1 Willpower for
successful program
We have programs in life. Programs are either personal or
public. Social development, political changes are the examples of public
programs. Most of the personal programs are related to study, money, relation
and reputation. Some programs get success and some fails. There are rules for
programs to get success.
A) Program that
matches one's ability
Different people have different abilities. That's why everyone
can't fit everywhere. Pele has the ability to play football; he may not fit on
singing. It's said that task done by one can be done by other too. But all of
them can't complete the same task with the same efficiency. The wrong
combination of ability and program can't give the best result. Abilities are
developed at the time of learning and schooling but no one can learn
everything. People have their specific field of ability. Investing much effort
and time on the wrong subject doesn't give the best result. One can achieve
success to some extent with very hard work on an unmatched subject, but it's
not sufficient to survive in this competitive world.
B) Naturally possible
program
News reads 'A child dies trying to be Spider-Man'.
Sometimes even we adult make some effort in the hope of making our imagination
come true. But it's never possible to break down a tree with a mouthful of air.
Programs that contradict to natural law will never workout. Some impossible
looking programs work pretty well after an investment of hard effort for a long
time. But that doesn't mean that impossible things can be possible. Developing
the skill after a long time of practice, some difficult task can be performed
but the task that goes beyond the law of nature can never be possible. The
difficult task can be accomplished but impossible one always remains
impossible.
C) unlimited time
frame for the rule 'Consciousness + Situation = Changed Situation'
There is a popular Chinese fiction about an
old man who tries to move the mountain to make a path. All people say him
stupid for his 'impossible' idea. But he has logic; mountain never gets taller.
Removal of a single stone decreases its height by the length of the stone.
Although he dies on the way of moving the mountain, his sons will continue the
work and their sons after they die and even their sons and grandsons and so on.
In this way, the work is never going to stop and some day in future the task
will be accomplished. The old man is absolutely correct in his logic. Duty is
about making an endless effort, not calculating deadline for the success. The
endless effort is an inseparable part of willpower. If people feels tired and
give up the effort it is because there is a lack of willpower. If people never
get tired and their efforts go on and go on endlessly, then that is an actual
willpower and that can claim a success some day in future.
There are some videos on the internet called
'People are awesome'. All the rules of willpower mentioned above have been
applied to these videos. First rule: the task on the video is not possible for
all the people but to those who have the ability. Second rule: Although they
seem to be impossible task, actually they are not. They are difficult but not
impossible. Third rule: the people did not get success on the task easily and
immediately. They too have spent a lot of time and effort on practicing before
they achieve the success.
The reason we can't break down a tree with a
mouthful of air is because this is beyond the rule of natural. The sufficient
force of air to break a tree can't be blown from a mouth. If you have willpower
you can make someone like you who hates you now. Yes, that is possible by
willpower. But the rule of willpower can't apply on something that is
impossible by natural rule.
Sometimes our heart wants something but mind
thinks it's not good to want. When we let our brain think against the will
(desire) of heart the willpower loses the power and only will remains. 'Will'
without 'Power' is not necessarily fulfilled. Success is possible if one
can continue something equally by heart and mind. But it may not be possible
for all the people to continue keeping effort all the time by heart and mind.
Failure starts from
the point where we see alternatives. 'Will' can't get the 'Power' where there
are alternatives. If we face some difficulties our mind goes to the second
option. The feelings 'I have the second option if I fail the first one',
decreases our efficiency on work and it pushes the success far away. If the
task has no any alternatives, the condition becomes 'do or die'. The condition
'do or die' concentrates all the power of life to a certain target. The
function of a real willpower can be seen there. There is no existence of
tiredness and chance of surrender. This is the real willpower.
Talking about
willpower we should not mean that all of our successes are to be fulfilled by
struggles and willpower. A lot's of our desires are being fulfilled easily on
daily life. The rule of willpower is applied only on the wishes that are
difficult to fulfill but not impossible.
Now let's talk about two programs opposite to
each other, where one must lose for other's success. The election, tournament
etc are such programs. Every field of plan or program has their own
characteristics. Ability is the first thing on every field. To win
an election of political parties, the first thing to consider is how much
they are able to influence the people with their issues. After the ability,
'tireless effort' has second place. Lionel Massy has the ability to play
football but he always fails when it's time to win a medal for his country. So
he announced retirement being hopeless and desperate. Playing football and
winning is not impossible for him because he is a good player with capability.
But it became impossible for him to stand steady against the pressure created
by big hope by his numerous fans all over the world. The possibility of winning
is always on the way if he can continue making the tireless effort. If the rule
'Situation + Consciousness = Changed Situation' is not limited to any timeframe
and effort is continued endlessly then some day in far or near future winning a
tournament or an election is possible.
Study of philosophy, theory and program does
not mean to find out the formulas of success. They only mean to understand the
truth. Understanding truth is not sufficient for success. The three rules
mentioned above must be fulfilled for the success.
3.2 Impossibility of
Communism
For the betterment of
oneself, family, society, country and even for the whole world
sometimes we make wishes. The wishes don't itself come true until we put an
effort on it. By our hard efforts, only such wishes can come true which are
naturally possible. The wishes that can't come true by natural rules are called
fantasy. One of the examples of fantasy is Communism. Let's talk about this
with some backgrounds. Industrial Revolution started in the 18th century.
As a result of the
industrial revolution, laborer class appeared in the society. Life of laborers
was miserable because they were poor and exploited. Many reformers started
working for the welfare of laborers. Saint-Simon, Charles
Fourier, Robert Owen are some of them. Early co-operative, Rochdale
Society of Equitable Pioneers was established at that time. But real
problems on laborers' life were not solved. Later on, Karl Marx and
Friedrich Engels published a political program that leads the society
to socialism and gradually communism. The movement process has been described
as class struggle and the dictatorship of proletariats. At this point, one
can obviously guess that help from Hegel's dialecticism is taken
just to justify the class struggle. The class struggle based on the theory
of dialecticism leads the society to the dictatorship
of proletariats. Then the society completes the phase of
socialism and turns into communism. This is the logic presented by
Marx.
Marxist theories
of dialectical materialism were not first developed to predicate
the future society as communism. In fact, the conception of communism was first
assumed then dialectical materialism was later introduced just
to give it a theoretical base. Marx thought the previous socialist
movement of Robert Owens's failed because they lacked theory on their movement.
So Marx searched theory and found Hegel's dialecticism with added materialistic
view suits his program of communism. This is how dialectical materialism was
formulated. Marx initially was a revolutionary. He thought revolution need
philosophy. So he was obliged to be a philosopher.
In the communist
society imagined by Marx and Engels, there will not be common people like it is
in today's society. There will be no crime, no police, and no jail. Even there
is no money because no need to buy anything. People's needs are provided by
society and social needs are fulfilled by people.
Vladimir Lenin's
'Collected Works 4' published by Progress Publication Moscow reads 'Today we
don't have sufficient matters to say how exactly will states vanish or is
replaced by local communes to establish the great
communism'. Is not this reading enough to know that communism is just
imaginary society? If he doesn't know how exactly present society
will vanish then how exactly can he say that communism is
inevitable?
Marx, Engels, Lenin
all have to say that today's ordinary people will not be there in Communism.
There will be some upgraded people. People with no emotions such as love,
pity, jealousy, anger etc. never existed in the past, and
neither they are in the present nor will be in the future. People with no
emotions are not possible and so is the communism.
Moreover, dialectical materialism doesn't apply on everything
because two opposite sides don't exist on everything, but only in some
limited field. Hence scope of dialectical materialism is limited. It
can't be a complete philosophy. Finally the conclusion is 'communist program
ends on imagination and dialectical materialistic philosophy on
incompletion'.
Conclusion
On
the way of understanding and explaining the world, many views have been
developed. Some are given below:
A) Spiritual world view
This
view states that the world is governed by the power of God. Everything that
happens in the world is the wish of the god. That's why spiritual people pray
to god with a hope that god will favor them. Most of the people in the world
still believe in this view. This is the oldest world view.
B) Historical and dialectical materialism
This
view doesn't accept the existence of god. It has to say that the world is
dynamic and it explains every change in the world as result of conflict between
two opposite things.
C) Law of Action and Reaction
This too doesn't accept the existence of god. It says that every
action creates a reaction and every result has a reason.
If
we see the historical practice on philosophical writings, we can see that
philosophy, theory and program all have been mixed-up in a single explanation.
Many theories have claimed themselves to be a philosophy in most of the cases.
This is the wrong way. 'Law of Action and Reaction' is trying to break the
chain of this kind of practice.
'World
view' is in upper level than the 'philosophy'. There are three sections into
'world-view'. First one is 'Philosophy' which explains everything with the help
of common rule. Second one is 'Theory' which analyzes and explains every detail
of related subject. The theory that works in one subject does not work in
another. Third one is 'Program' which is determined by desires and necessities
of people.
The
common rules of Philosophy that can explain the world DOES NOT need to be ONE
AND ONLY RULE. There can be many rules which can explain the world correctly.
The number 10 can be explained as 2+3+5=10 or 15-5=10 or in various other ways.
All of them are capable to explain the number. Philosophy associated with 'Law
of Action and Reaction' has explained the world with the help of the 'Cycle
Rule' and 'Situation + Consciousness = Changed Situation'. Other philosopher
can explain the world in another way or rule. But the rule must be able to
explain everything of the world. If the rule is unable to explain everything
then it is not the 'Philosophy' but he 'Theory' for the related subject.
Different
rules of philosophy and theory must not contradict to each other. If they
contradict, both or one of them must be wrong. 4+6=10, 12-2=10 and other rules
can explain the number 10 and all of them are true because they do not
contradict to each other.
Program
may contradict to each other because they are not rules but the desires of
people. Some may want to build something whereas other may want to destroy it.
People may want to study theories to obtain the knowledge which can help them
to succeed on their program. Theories contain detail explanation on the
subjects. But the philosophy is not limited to the certain subject but it
contains the common rule that can explain everything.
The
whole package of 'Philosophy', 'Theory' and 'Program' is called 'world-view'.
'Law of Action and Reaction' is a complete world-view.
No comments:
Post a Comment